Posted by: zanshin, 2009-05-13 11:05

Story

NBC News' Meet The Press: Dick Cheney

Tim Russert, Dick Cheney, 2001-09-16 (Sunday), From The Wilderness
GUEST: Vice President DICK CHENEY

MODERATOR/PANELIST: Tim Russert - NBC News

This is a rush transcript provided for the information and convenience of the press. Accuracy is not guaranteed. In case of doubt, please check with MEET THE PRESS - NBC NEWS (202)885-4598

(Sundays: (202)885-4200)

MR. TIM RUSSERT: And we are Greentop in the shadows of the presidential retreat at Camp David. Mr. Vice President, good morning and welcome.

VICE PRES. DICK CHENEY: Good morning, Tim.

MR. RUSSERT: This is the first television program to originate from here, which underscores the seriousness of our discussion this morning. The president, the vice president, the national security team have been meeting for the last 36 hours. What can you share with the American people this morning?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, Tim, this is the first chance we've had really since the events this week to sit down and really focus on various plans and propositions, things we ought to be doing going forward. Up till now it's been focused very much on trying to manage the crisis and to deal with the problems of the immediate situation. But yesterday we've been able to come up and get everybody together, a lot of work done, staff work done in preparation for it and sit down and really spend some time looking at what our strategy ought to be and how we ought to proceed.

MR. RUSSERT: When the president went to the World Trade Center on Friday he said, "The people who did this will hear from all of us soon." There's an expectation in the country that we're about to pay back big time, quickly. What should the American people think or feel about that?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I think the important thing here, Tim, is for people to understand that, you know, things have changed since last Tuesday. The world shifted in some respects. Clearly, what we're faced with here is a situation where terrorism is struck home in the United States. We've been subject to targets of terrorist attacks before, especially overseas with our forces and American personnel overseas, but this time because of what happened in New York and what happened in Washington, it's a qualitatively different set of circumstances.

It's also important for people to understand that this is a long-term proposition. It's not like, well, even Desert Storm where we had a buildup for a few months, four days of combat, and it was over with. This is going to be the kind of work that will probably take years because the focus has to be not just on any one individual, the problem here is terrorism. And even in this particular instance, it looks as though the responsible organization was a group called al-Qaida. It's Arabic for "The Base."

MR. RUSSERT: That's Osama bin Laden.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: He headed it up and organized it, but it's a very broad, kind of loose coalition of groupings that includes not only his forces but it also includes, for example, Islamic Jihad from Egypt. It includes a movement from is Uzbekistan. The groups that are terrorist organizations, people that oftentimes move around them, sometimes share common ideologies that operate on a worldwide basis. And what we have to do is take down those networks of terrorist organizations, and as say I think this is going to be a struggle that the United States is going to be involved in for the foreseeable future. There's not going to be an end date that we say, "There, it's all over with." It's going to require constant vigilance on our part to avoid problems in the future, but it's also going to require a major effort and, obviously, quite possibly use of military force.

MR. RUSSERT: Do you believe that anyone who participated in the events on Tuesday or, in fact, even in a support role, or on a plane that wasn't successfully hijacked, are they still at large in the United States?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: We don't know. The possibility clearly exists that there could be additional terrorists out there that were part of this operation that maybe got cold feet and didn't get on the airplane, or for one reason or another were thwarted in their efforts. We have to assume that possibility exists. We had these 19 individuals in the United States, some of them for several years, training, preparing, getting ready for this operation and we can by no means assume now that that's all there is. There may well be other operations that have been planned and are, in fact, in the works.

MR. RUSSERT: When the president said, "Everyone in uniform get ready," did that - does that suggest a massive call-up of reserves?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: We've had some reserve call-up. We called up, of course, 35,000 reservists. We felt that was important to do here. I think the way to think about it, Tim, is to think about the target and what our objectives are here. Obviously, we're interested in individuals who were directly involved in planning, coordinating, ordering the attack. And-but those tend to be individuals or small groupings of individuals, cells, perhaps, various places around the world. We need to go find them and root them out. And - but we also - that's different here, what's changed in terms of U.S. policy, is the president's determination to also go after those nations and organizations and people that lend support to these terrorist operators.

If you've got a nation out there now that has provided a base, training facilities, a sanctuary, as has been true, for example, in this case, probably with Afghanistan, then they have to understand, and others like them around the world have to understand, that if you provide sanctuary to terrorists, you face the full wrath of the United States of America. And that we will, in fact, aggressively go after these nations to make certain that they cease and desist from providing support for these kinds of organizations.

MR. RUSSERT: Full wrath. That's a very strong statement to the Afghans this morning.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: It is, indeed. It is, indeed.

MR. RUSSERT: The president said that Osama bin Laden was the prime suspect. Why?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: There is just a lot of evidence to link his organization, the al-Qaida organization, and he is the head of al-Qaida, to this operation. There are some ties, for example, to some of the people involved here back to the U.S.S. Cole bombing in Yemen. We're able to tell - going back now looking at relationships and the way they've operated in the past, we're quite confident that, in fact, as the president said, he is the prime suspect. That doesn't mean we know all there is to know yet. That doesn't mean there weren't others involved. As I mentioned, the Egyptian Islamic Jihad has a very close working relationship with this organization. So there may well be others. We want to continue to investigate aggressively to make sure we've wrapped up and understand fully all who were involved. But clearly, the evidence at this point takes us very much in that direction.

MR. RUSSERT: You have no doubt that Osama bin Laden played some role in this.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I have no doubt that he and his organization played a significant role in this.

MR. RUSSERT: Were you surprised by the precision and sophistication of the operation?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, certainly, we were surprised in the sense that, you know, there had been information coming in that a big operation was planned, but that's sort of a trend that you see all the time in these kinds of reports. But we didn't...

MR. RUSSERT: No specific threat?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: No specific threat involving really a domestic operation or involving what happened, obviously, the cities, airliner and so forth. We did go on alert with our overseas forces a number of times during the course of the summer when we thought the threat level had risen significantly. So clearly, we were surprised by what happened here. On the other hand, in terms of the sophistication of it, it's interesting to look at, because clearly what happened is you got some people committed to die in the course of the operation, you got them visas, you got them entered into the United States. They came here. Some of them enrolled in our commercial aviation schools and learned to fly, courtesy of our own capabilities here in the United States. Then what they needed in order to execute was some degree of coordination, obviously, in terms of timing. But they needed knives, cardboard cutters, razor blades, whatever it was, and an airline ticket. And that's it. They then were able to take over the aircraft and use our own, you know, heavily loaded with fuel large aircraft to take over and use it.

MR. RUSSERT: Intentionally choosing planes that had lots of fuel and a few passengers?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: It certainly looks that way. And the - so the sophisticated - on the one hand it's very simple. It doesn't involve a lot of hardware or complex devices that they have to bring into the United States. They, in effect, turned some of our own system against us, but its simplicity does, in fact, also speak volumes in terms of planning, creativity, ingenuity in terms of how they go about these kinds of operations.

MR. RUSSERT: We clearly will have to revisit our visa procedures.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: We ought to look at all aspects of the operation here in terms of what happened. Clearly there are going to be a lot of lessons to be learned from it. But it's important for us, too, not to get trapped into thinking if we just guard against another situation where terrorists can hijack airplanes and use them to hit vital targets in the U.S. that we've dealt with the problem. I'm sure they're out there right now thinking about new, creative ways to come after us that don't involve any of those techniques at all, but something totally new.

MR. RUSSERT: Osama bin Laden released a training video, 100 minutes long, which was obtained by the Western media this summer, and I want to show a portion of that to you and give you a chance to respond to it, and we'll play it right now. These are followers of his chanting, "We have to fight every day, even to the shedding of blood in God's righteous path." There he is himself with his own rifle. They go on to say, "We thank God for granting us victory the day we destroyed the Cole in the sea." That's the U.S.S. destroyer that was hit last year. Those are his supporters marching. There you are as secretary of Defense visiting Saudi Arabia, used in this video to rally support for Osama bin Laden. And bin Laden himself, "We have to practice the way of the suicidal commandos of faith and the heroism of the resistance fighter and we refuse their culture and we will take advantage of their misfortunes and the blood of their wounded." He goes on to say, Mr. Secretary, that, "With small capabilities we can defeat the U.S. America is much weaker than it appears." What's your message this morning to Osama bin Laden?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, I think he seriously misreads the American people. I think the - I mean, you have to ask yourself, why somebody would do what he does. Why is someone so motivated? Obviously he's filled with hate for the United States and for everything we stand for...

MR. RUSSERT: Why?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: ...freedom and democracy.

MR. RUSSERT: Why does he hate us so much?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: It must have something to do with his background, his own upbringing. He's the son of a prominent Saudi family, successful business group with significant wealth. He went and served in Afghanistan with the mujahedeen during the war against the Russians, and he has, for whatever reason, developed this intense hatred of everything that relates to the United States. And his objective, obviously, is to try to influence our behavior to force us to withdraw from that part of the world, and clearly he's not going to be successful. And...

MR. RUSSERT: He has stated unequivocally that he wants the United States out of the Middle East. He no longer wants the United States to be the ally of Israel. Will our relationship with Israel change in any way, shape or form because of this event?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: No. The fact of the matter is that the-we'll not allow him to achieve his aims. We're not about to change our policies or change our basic fundamental beliefs. What we are going to do is aggressively go after Mr. bin Laden, obviously, and all of his associates, and even if it takes a long time, I'm convinced eventually we'll prevail.

MR. RUSSERT: There is an FBI wanted poster, and there he is himself, wanted for the murder of US nationals outside the United States. He's under indictment for his involvement in blowing up embassies in Tanzania and Kenya. Could we say to the Afghanistan government, "You are harboring a fugitive from justice. Give him over in 48 hours or we're coming in and taking him"?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: We could say such a thing.

MR. RUSSERT: Legally?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, legally certainly. I'll simply restate again, Tim, I don't want to get into the business of predicting what specific steps we will take. But without question, the president has been very, very clear that to harbor terrorists is to, in effect, accept a certain degree of guilt for the acts that they commit. And the government of Afghanistan has to understand that we believe they have, indeed, been harboring a man who committed, and whose organization committed, this most recent egregious act.

MR. RUSSERT: You're convinced he's still in Afghanistan?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: We don't know.

MR. RUSSERT: Is there any international law or United States law which would prohibit us from killing him if we found him?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Not in my estimation, Tim. But I'd have to check with the lawyers on that, obviously. Lawyers always have a role to play, but one of the intriguing things here is the way in which people have rallied around, other governments have rallied around this notion that, in fact, this is a war. We've seen our NATO allies for the first time in history invoke Article 5, an attack against one is an attack against all. It's never before been done. They unanimously agreed to that proposition earlier this week in Brussels.

I think the world increasingly will understand what we have here are a group of barbarians, that they threaten all of us, that the U.S. is the target at the moment, but one of the things to remember is if you look at the roster of countries who lost people in the bombing in New York, over 40 countries have had someone killed or have significant numbers missing. The British, for example, have an estimated 100 dead and 500 to 700 still missing. So it's an attack not just upon the United States but upon, you know, civilized society.

MR. RUSSERT: A very important country in all this is Pakistan, on the border of Afghanistan. Pakistan - there are reports on the wires today-has sent a delegation to the Taliban government in Afghanistan saying it's time to turn Osama bin Laden over. The Pakistan government is also saying to its people this morning, "We will get more aid from the United States. The United States will lift economic sanctions against us. And we've been given assurances that the Indian government and the Israeli government will not be part of any military operation based in Pakistan." Can you confirm that?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I've seen some communication back and forth at this point. Let me simply say we have had discussions with the Paks. President Bush called President Musharraf just yesterday afternoon from Camp David. They've had a good conversation. We have made certain requests of the Pakistanis. They have agreed to work with us in this endeavor, and some of that's covered in the statement they've made there.

MR. RUSSERT: They will get more assistance from us.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, we'd like to be able to work with them. You've got to remember, Pakistan's been a close friend and ally of the United States in the past. The relationship's been somewhat strained in recent years primarily because congressionally imposed sanctions have had an adverse effect, clearly, on the relationship, and the sanctions were imposed as the Pakistanis developed nuclear weapons. But we're clearly in a situation here where that relationship is important. It's important to us. It's important to Pakistan. Pakistan borders Afghanistan; they one of only three countries that have diplomatic relations with the Taliban in Afghanistan. They can be very helpful in this case, and we expect they will be.

MR. RUSSERT: And there's nothing wrong with providing economic rewards for helpful behavior.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: No. I think you're going to want both the carrot and the stick approach.

MR. RUSSERT: Pakistan also has a nuclear capability. How dangerous is it for that government to come out against Osama bin Laden or be helpful to the United States? Are we concerned about destabilizing Pakistan with nuclear capability, a capability that could fall in the hands of the Taliban or Osama bin Laden?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, we're clearly very sensitive to those kinds of problems. Any time you're dealing in that part of the world in the Middle East, the potential for instability always exists. You could have a change in government in relatively short notice, and we're well aware of all that. But it also - it's one of the reasons, frankly, you'll see the al-Qaida organization, Osama bin Laden, choosing to locate in that part of the world because it is an area of instability, because there are places that nobody really controls. And those are the areas we're going to have to operate in if we're going to be successful. And again, the key here to keep in mind is that what we're asking nations to do, and which the Paks have clearly made a decision to do, is we're asking nations to step up and be counted. They're going to have to decide. Are they going to stand with the United States and believe in freedom and democracy and civilization, or are they going to stand with the terrorists and the barbarians, if you will? And it's a fairly clear-cut choice. And I'm delighted to see that Pakistan has, in fact, stepped up to the task.

MR. RUSSERT: Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan - three critical countries in the Middle East, who have been somewhat supportive of the United States. They also have segments of their population that look at Osama bin Laden as a hero. If we demand that they support us, do we risk destabilizing those governments?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: No, I think you've got to recognize from the standpoint of the Saudis, for example, they're a prime target for this organization of terrorists, Osama bin Laden. He adamantly opposes the Saudi royal family. Probably second only to the United States would be his hatred for the current government in Saudi Arabia. With respect to Egypt, for example, the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, these are groups and organizations that have threatened the government of Egypt in the past. President Mubarak's been the target of several assassination attempts during the course of his career; some of them promulgated by these kinds of groups and organizations. So I think governments, friends of the United States, the governments you mentioned, Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, etc., they understand very clearly that it's as much in their interest as it is in ours that we end these kinds of activities and that we put a stop to this kind of international terrorism. And I think they'll be prepared to help us.

MR. RUSSERT: Mr. Vice President, how difficult and delicate is it to send this message that we're going to uproot terrorism and Osama bin Laden and some other cells, but that this is not a war against Islam and not a war against all Arab people?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: We have to continually remind folks of that. The president has been very clear, and it would be a huge mistake for we as Americans to assume that this represents some kind of - or should lead us to some kind of condemnation of Islam. It's clearly not the case. This is a perversion, if you will, of some of these religious beliefs by an extremist group. We have extremists associated with, you know, every imaginable religion in the world. But this is by no means a war against Islam. We've got a great many Arab Americans, for example, who are first class, loyal American citizens. We need to make certain that we don't make the mistake of assuming that everybody who comes from a certain ethnic group or certain religious background is somehow to be blamed for this. Clearly, that's not the case. They are as appalled by it as we are.

MR. RUSSERT: When Osama bin Laden took responsibility for blowing up the embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, U.S. embassies, several hundred died, the United States launched 60 tomahawk missiles into his training sites in Afghanistan. It only emboldened him. It only inspired him and seemed even to increase his recruitment. Is it safe to say that that kind of response is not something we're considering, in that kind of minute magnitude?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I'm going to be careful here, Tim, because I - clearly it would be inappropriate for me to talk about operational matters, specific options or the kinds of activities we might undertake going forward. We do, indeed, though, have, obviously, the world's finest military. They've got a broad range of capabilities. And they may well be given missions in connection with this overall task and strategy.

We also have to work, though, sort of the dark side, if you will. We've got to spend time in the shadows in the intelligence world. A lot of what needs to be done here will have to be done quietly, without any discussion, using sources and methods that are available to our intelligence agencies, if we're going to be successful. That's the world these folks operate in, and so it's going to be vital for us to use any means at our disposal, basically, to achieve our objective.

MR. RUSSERT: There have been restrictions placed on the United States intelligence gathering, reluctance to use unsavory characters, those who violated human rights, to assist in intelligence gathering. Will we lift some of those restrictions?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Oh, I think so. I think the - one of the by-products, if you will, of this tragic set of circumstances is that we'll see a very thorough sort of reassessment of how we operate and the kinds of people we deal with. There's - if you're going to deal only with sort of officially approved, certified good guys, you're not going to find out what the bad guys are doing. You need to be able to penetrate these organizations. You need to have on the payroll some very unsavory characters if, in fact, you're going to be able to learn all that needs to be learned in order to forestall these kinds of activities. It is a mean, nasty, dangerous dirty business out there, and we have to operate in that arena. I'm convinced we can do it; we can do it successfully. But we need to make certain that we have not tied the hands, if you will, of our intelligence communities in terms of accomplishing their mission.

MR. RUSSERT: These terrorists play by a whole set of different rules. It's going to force us, in your words, to get mean, dirty and nasty in order to take them on, right? And they should realize there will be more than simply a pinprick bombing.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Yeah, the - I think it's - the thing that I sense - and, of course, that's only been a few days, but I have never seen such determination on the part of - well, my colleagues in government, on the part of the American people, on the part of our friends and allies overseas, and even on the part of some who are not ordinarily deemed friends of the United States, determined in this particular instance to shift and not be tolerant any longer of these kinds of actions or activities.

MR. RUSSERT: Even if we take out Osama bin Laden, that will not stop terrorism.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: No. No. He's the target at the moment. But I don't want to convey the impression that somehow, you know, if we had his head on a platter today, that that would solve the problem. It won't. You've got this organization, as I say, called al-Qaida. It's - somebody described it the other day as - it's like an Internet chat room, that people who come and participate in it, for one reason or another, engage in terrorism, have sometimes different motives and ideologies, but the tactics they use, the way they operate, their targets, that will continue until we go out, basically, and make the world unsafe for terrorists. And that's a key part of the strategy, in terms of working aggressively with those nations that have previously provided support and sustenance and sanctuary, to see to it that they no longer do that.

MR. RUSSERT: You wouldn't mind having his head on a platter.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I would take it today.

MR. RUSSERT: Saddam Hussein, your old friend, his government had this to say: "The American cowboy is rearing the fruits of crime against humanity." If we determine that Saddam Hussein is also harboring terrorists, and there's a track record there, would we have any reluctance of going after Saddam Hussein?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: No.

MR. RUSSERT: Do we have evidence that he's harboring terrorists?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: There is - in the past, there have been some activities related to terrorism by Saddam Hussein. But at this stage, you know, the focus is over here on al-Qaida and the most recent events in New York. Saddam Hussein's bottled up, at this point, but clearly, we continue to have a fairly tough policy where the Iraqis are concerned.

MR. RUSSERT: Do we have any evidence linking Saddam Hussein or Iraqis to this operation?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: No.

MR. RUSSERT: Let me turn to the events of Tuesday. Where were you when you first learned a plane had struck the World Trade Center?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, I was in my office Tuesday morning. Monday, I had been in Kentucky, and the president had been in the White House. Tuesday, our roles were sort of reversed. He was in Florida, and I was in the White House Tuesday morning. And a little before 9, my speechwriter came in. We were going to go over some speeches coming up. And my secretary called in just as we were starting to meet just before 9:00 and said an airplane had hit the World Trade Center, and that was the first one that went in. So we turned on the television and watched for a few minutes, and then actually saw the second plane hit the World Trade Center. And the - as soon as that second plane showed up, that's what triggered the thought: terrorism, that this was an attack...

MR. RUSSERT: You sensed it immediately, "This is deliberate"?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Yeah. Then I convened in my office. Condi Rice came down. Her office is right near mine there in the West Wing.

MR. RUSSERT: The national security adviser.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: National security adviser, my chief of staff, Scooter Libby, Mary Matalin, who works for me, convened in my office, and we started talking about getting the Counterterrorism Task Force up and operating. I talked with the president. I'd given word to Andy Card's staff, who is right next door, to get hold of Andy and/or the president and that I wanted to talk to him as soon as they could hook it up. This call came in, and the president knew at this point about that. We discussed a statement that he might make, and the first statement he made describing this as an act of apparent terrorism flowed out of those conversations. While I was there, over the next several minutes, watching developments on the television and as we started to get organized to figure out what to do, my Secret Service agents came in and, under these circumstances, they just move. They don't say "sir" or ask politely. They came in and said, "Sir, we have to leave immediately," and grabbed me and...

MR. RUSSERT: Literally grabbed you and moved you?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Yeah. And, you know, your feet touch the floor periodically. But they're bigger than I am, and they hoisted me up and moved me very rapidly down the hallway, down some stairs, through some doors and down some more stairs into an underground facility under the White House, and, as a matter of fact, it's a corridor, locked at both ends, and they did that because they had received a report that an airplane was headed for the White House.

MR. RUSSERT: This is Flight 77, which had left Dulles.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Which turned out to be Flight 77. It left Dulles, flown west towards Ohio, been captured by the terrorists. They turned off the transponder, which led to a later report that a plane had gone down in Ohio, but it really hadn't. Of course, then they turned back and headed back towards Washington. As best we can tell, they came initially at the White House and...

MR. RUSSERT: The plane actually circled the White House?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Didn't circle it, but was headed on a track into it. The Secret Service has an arrangement with the F.A.A. They had open lines after the World Trade Center was...

MR. RUSSERT: Tracking it by radar.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: And when it entered the danger zone and looked like it was headed for the White House was when they grabbed me and evacuated me to the basement. The plane obviously didn't hit the White House. It turned away and, we think, flew a circle and came back in and then hit the Pentagon. And that's what the radar track looks like. The result of that - once I got down into the shelter, the first thing I did - there's a secure phone there. First thing I did was pick up the telephone and call the president again, who was still down in Florida, at that point, and strongly urged him to delay his return.

MR. RUSSERT: You told him to stay away from Washington.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I said, 'Delay your return. We don't know what's going on here, but it looks like, you know, we've been targeted.'

MR. RUSSERT: Why did you make that judgment?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, it goes to - you know, sort of my basic role as vice president is to worry about presidential succession. And my job, above all other things, is to be prepared to take over if something happens to the president. But over the years from my time with President Ford, as secretary of Defense, on the Intel Committee and so forth, I've been involved in a number of programs that were aimed at ensuring presidential succession. We did a lot of planning during the Cold War, Tim, with respect to the possibility of a nuclear incident. And one of the key requirements always is to protect the presidency. It's not about George Bush or Dick Cheney. It's about the occupant in the office. And one of the things that we did later on that day were tied directly to guaranteeing presidential succession, and that our enemies, whoever they might be, could not decapitate the federal government and leave us leaderless in a moment of crisis. That's why, for example, when we have a State of the Union speech and we've got the entire government assembled - the president, vice president, congressional leaders, Cabinet and so forth - we always leave a Cabinet member out. He's always taken to a secure location and set up there in case something should happen in the House chambers so we still have a president.

MR. RUSSERT: Did you have any role in Speaker Hastert...

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Yes.

MR. RUSSERT: ...speaker of the House being taken away?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: We evacuated Speaker Hastert to a secure facility, and later, the rest of the congressional leadership. I also ordered the evacuation of Cabinet members. And so we sent Tommy Thompson, Ann Veneman, Gale Norton also up to a secure facility. And in the days since, we've always

maintained to say - I've spent a good deal of my time up at Camp David since the president returned to the White House just so we weren't both together in the same place so we could ensure the survival of the government.

The president was on Air Force One. We received a threat to Air Force One - came through the Secret Service...

MR. RUSSERT: A credible threat to Air Force One. You're convinced of that.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I'm convinced of that. Now, you know, it may have been phoned in by a crank, but in the midst of what was going on, there was no way to know that. I think it was a credible threat, enough for the Secret Service to bring it to me. Once I left that immediate shelter, after I talked to the president, urged him to stay away for now, well, I went down into what's call a PEOC, the Presidential Emergency Operations Center, and there, I had Norm Mineta...

MR. RUSSERT: Secretary of Transportation.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: ...secretary of Transportation, access to the FAA. I had Condi Rice with me and several of my key staff people. We had access, secured communications with Air Force One, with the secretary of Defense over in the Pentagon. We had also the secure videoconference that ties together the White House, CIA, State, Justice, Defense - a very useful and valuable facility. We have the counterterrorism task force up on that net. And so I was in a position to be able to see all the stuff coming in, receive reports and then make decisions in terms of acting with it. But when I arrived there within a short order, we had word the Pentagon's been hit. We had word the State Department had been bombed, that a car bomb had gone off at the State Department. Turned out not to be true, but we didn't know that at the time. We had a report that Norm had provided that there were six airplanes that might have been hijacked, and that's what we started working off of, was that list of six.

Now we could account for two of them in New York. The third one we didn't know what had happened to it. It turned out it had hit the Pentagon. But the first reports on the Pentagon attack suggested a helicopter, and then later, a private jet, and it was only after we got ahold of some eyewitnesses that we knew it was an American Airlines flight. So then we had three planes accounted for, but we still have had three outstanding.

We had reports of planes down in Ohio, turned out not to be true; down in Pennsylvania; turned out that was true. And all of that - excuse me - added with the report of a prospective attack on Air Force One itself, we'd have been absolute fools not to go into button down mode, make sure we had successors evacuated, make sure the president was safe and secure. Offutt was a good location for that purpose, and also the president...

MR. RUSSERT: In Nebraska.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: In Nebraska.

MR. RUSSERT: Are you convinced there were only four hijackings, that there were not other hijacks attempted that we don't know about?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I don't know. We know there were four, of course. I don't think until we've completed our investigation, looked at all the ties and relationships, we'll be able to say that there were no other plans for additional planes.

MR. RUSSERT: When you made the recommendation to the president, "Stay where you are, go to a secure facility in Nebraska," were you ever concerned, did it ever enter your thought process that there would be criticism of the president for not coming back to Washington during a crisis?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I didn't really think about it. I mean, it was such a clear-cut case, in my estimation, that the most important thing here is to preserve the presidency. We don't know what's happening. We know Washington's under attack. We don't know by who, we don't know how many additional planes are coming. We don't know what all is planned for us, at this point. Within about 35 or 40 minutes, we'd seen this unfolding of this monstrous terrorist attack, and it was absolutely the right decision. I have no qualms about it at all. The president wanted to come back. We talked repeatedly during the course of the day. He made it clear he wanted him back as soon as we thought it made sense. The Secret Service did not want him back. They even talked to me to try to get me to evacuate a couple of times, but I didn't want to leave the node that we'd established there, in terms of having all of this capability tied together by communications where we could, in fact, make decisions and act. And if I'd have left, gotten on a helicopter and launched out of the White House, all of that would have been broken down. And we had the presidential succession pretty well guaranteed, so I thought it was appropriate for me to stay in the White House.

MR. RUSSERT: Symbolisms are so important to terrorists. The fact that George Bush stayed at the White House, you came to Camp David. Are you concerned that that sends a mixed message to the terrorists that they can disrupt our government, or do you err on the side of caution and safety and keep the two key leaders separated?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, we erred on the side of, I'd say, responsibility. The - when something like this happens, we've got certain obligations and responsibilities you've got to carry out. And those took priority. They did for the president. They did for me. Also with modern communications - I mean, the president was in touch with me throughout the day. We talked repeatedly. He made some key decisions that were very important to the operation. Once he got to Offutt, he convened a meeting of the National Security Council again using the secure video conference hookup and...

MR. RUSSERT: What's the most important decision you think he made during the course of the day?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, the - I suppose the toughest decision was this question of whether or not we would intercept incoming commercial aircraft.

MR. RUSSERT: And you decided?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: We decided to do it. We'd, in effect, put a flying combat air patrol up over the city; F-16s with an AWACS, which is an airborne radar system, and tanker support so they could stay up a long time. It doesn't do any good to put up a combat air patrol if you don't give them instructions to act, if, in fact, they feel it's appropriate.

MR. RUSSERT: So if the United States government became aware that a hijacked commercial airline was destined for the White House or the Capitol, we would take the plane down?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Yes. The president made the decision, on my recommendation as well, wholeheartedly concurred in the decision he made, that if the plane would not divert, if they wouldn't pay any attention to instructions to move away from the city, as a last resort, our pilots were authorized to take them out. Now, people say, you know, that's a horrendous decision to make. Well, it is. You've got an airplane full of American citizens, civilians, captured by hostages, captured by terrorists, headed and are you going to, in fact, shoot it down, obviously, and kill all those Americans on board? And you have to ask yourself, "If we had had combat air patrol up over New York and we'd had the opportunity to take out the two aircraft that hit the World Trade Center, would we have been justified in doing that?" I think absolutely we would have. Now, it turned out we did not have to execute on that authorization. But there were some - a few moments when we thought we might, when planes were incoming and we didn't know whether or not they were a problem aircraft until they'd diverted and gone elsewhere and been able to resolve it.

MR. RUSSERT: And that will be the policy of the United States in the future?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, the president will, I'm sure, make a decision, if those circumstances arise again. It's a presidential-level decision, and the president made, I think, exactly the right call in this case, to say, "I wished we'd had combat air patrol up over New York."

MR. RUSSERT: More and more, Mr. Vice President, we're finding out, it appears, that the fourth plane that crashed in Pennsylvania crashed because of some real heroism by Americans. Jeremy Glick had received a - called his wife to say he'd been hijacked. She informed him that two planes had struck the World Trade Center. And he said, "I think we have to do something."

VICE PRES. CHENEY: It's true. I think the Washington part of the attack was significantly interfered with. I'm speculating. Some of this is informed speculation; some of it's based on some evidence. But clearly, we know the plane that crashed outside Pittsburgh was headed for Washington. We know it was part of the scheme. Mr. Glick and others - Mr. Burnett - were very courageous when they made that decision, knowing that they were doomed.

MR. RUSSERT: And you've told his wife that, haven't you?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I called Mrs. Glick yesterday, as a matter of fact. Haven't been able to reach Mrs. Burnett yet, but I'm going to call her, too. And I'm sure there were probably others on the aircraft who helped, but what they did was to foil, I think, the attack on Washington. My guess is, speculation, that target probably would have been the Capitol building. It's big; it's easy to hit. I think one of the reasons that the White House did not get hit, I think it turned out to be tougher to see than they had anticipated. When you come in from the west, as American 77 did, unless you get up altitude a ways, you can't see the White House because the Executive Office Building is there.

MR. RUSSERT: And Treasury on the other side.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Treasury on the other side. And I'm speculating that the lack of ability to be able to acquire it visually may, in fact, have led them to go back.

MR. RUSSERT: Gave it up as a target...

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Yeah.

MR. RUSSERT: ...and went to the Pentagon, which is clearly visible?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: And went to the Pentagon instead. And speculation on my part. We'll never know for sure. But without question, the attack would have been much worse if it hadn't been for the courageous acts of those individuals on United 93.

MR. RUSSERT: Two important symbols. Should the World Trade Center be rebuilt?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I think we clearly want to redevelop that area. Exactly what it ought to - what it ought to look like and what will go in there, those are decisions that are going to have to be made by New York officials. But the president's very interested in supporting those efforts, and I'm absolutely convinced that that's the right thing to do. We don't let terrorists prevail in this day and age.

MR. RUSSERT: Should Ronald Reagan National Airport be re-opened?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: We've got to find ways to deal with that problem. It's been controversial from time to time over the years. But, of course, we've always kept Ronald Reagan open because of its location. It's very convenient for people living in Washington. The problem we have is, of course, that on the approach or takeoff from Reagan, you fly right up the Potomac and you're within seconds or a minute or two of being able to hit the White House, the Congress, important facilities in Washington. And finding the way to deal with those circumstances is going to have to precede, I think, a re-opening of the airport.

MR. RUSSERT: So it may be closed for some time.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: We don't know yet. I mean, Norm Mineta is working aggressively on this and - but we did - especially this week, we wanted to be supercautious. As long as there was the possibility there might be other teams out there that, in fact, planned the same kind of operation that the terrorists undertook on Tuesday. We thought it was prudent to keep it closed for now.

MR. RUSSERT: Mr. Vice President, we have to take a quick break. We'll be right back with more of our discussion with Vice President Dick Cheney. We're at Greentop in the shadows of Camp David. Be right back.

(Announcements)

MR. RUSSERT: A lot more questions for the vice president of the United States, Dick Cheney, right after this.

(Announcements)

MR. RUSSERT: And we are back talking to Vice President Dick Cheney. He's been here at Camp David speaking with the president and the national security team for the last 36 hours at least. Mr. Vice President, a lot of discussion as to our preparedness. The first hijacking was confirmed at 8:20, the Pentagon was struck at 9:40, and yet, it seems we were not able to scramble fighter jets in time to protect the Pentagon and perhaps even more than that. There have been at least five serious reports on domestic terrorism, how to cope with it, one given to you in May, Cheney to Lead Anti-Terrorism Plan. Were we ready for this?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Were we ready for it? I think the agencies responded very well once it happened. I think the courage and the bravery of the men and women of New York, for example, the first responders, if you will, fire and rescue teams, many of whom gave their lives when the towers collapsed, was superb. I don't think you can take anything away from them. But the problem you have here - I mean, if you think about it from the standpoint of aircraft - do we train our pilots to shoot down commercial airliners filled with American civilians? No. That's not a mission they've ever been given before. Now we've got to think about that. With respect to the intelligence area, there'll be, I'm sure, a lot of sort of Monday morning quarterbacking, second-guessing, if you will, about whether or not there was an intelligence failure. Clearly, we did not learn of this operation or we would have stopped it if we had. But I think it's important to remember that our men and women in the intelligence business out there all over the world 365 days a year, defending and protecting us, oftentimes very successful, oftentimes in ways we can never talk about, but we clearly need to do everything we can to forestall those kinds of activities by improving our intelligence capabilities, and this offers a lot of lessons learned.

At the same time, the key, though, is to go eliminate the terrorists. We may never have 100 percent perfection in terms of our intelligence capabilities to be able to penetrate and know about all these kinds of operations - Timothy McVeigh, for example, in Oklahoma City. But if we go after the terrorists, if we deny them sanctuary, if we take out their bases and their locations where they operate, that's probably the most effective way to deal with this threat. But we have to recognize, no matter how good we are, no matter how aggressively we pursue this, we're likely to be subject to that partly by the very nature of our society. We're an open society, we love it that way, that's very important to preserve that, and not to let the terrorists win by turning ourselves into some kind of police state.

MR. RUSSERT: The chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee said this is a failure of great dimension in terms of intelligence. Will George Tenet remain as director of the CIA?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I think George clearly should remain as director of the CIA. I think - I've had great confidence in him. I've watched him operate now and worked closely with him for the last seven or eight months. I think he and his people do superb work for us. And I think it would be a tragedy if somehow we were to go back now in the search for scapegoats and say that George Tenet or any other official ought to be eliminated at this point. I don't think you can say that.

MR. RUSSERT: When Air Force One returned to Washington, we saw it accompanied by fighter jets.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Right.

MR. RUSSERT: General Norman Schwarzkopf, a man you know well, has suggested that perhaps in the short term, at least, Air Force One should be accompanied by fighter jets while flying over the United States just as a precaution.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Perhaps. I don't know that we've made that judgment yet, that decision yet. You know, what happened on Tuesday - of course, once we got all the aircraft grounded, that gave us a fairly high degree of confidence that we were in control. The problem was, there were some 2,000 aircraft up when this operation started, and it took several hours to get them all down. And as long as there were aircraft up and there was a report of a threat against Air Force One, and there were aircraft we couldn't account for, that might, in fact, have been taken by the terrorists, flying cover for Air Force One was very important.

MR. RUSSERT: Would we consider using fighter jets to protect Air Force One for the short...

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I think if we believe it's necessary, we absolutely will.

MR. RUSSERT: In Europe, the government provides security at the airports, highly trained, well-paid specialists. Here in the United States, it's a low-paying job hired by the airlines. Would we consider having the government take over airline security, airport security?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: We're clearly going to have to look at this whole question and find ways to improve and enhance our security, without a doubt. And it's going to be a prime focus for Norm Mineta and the folks over at the F.A.A. Exactly what the answer ought to be, Tim, I don't have enough information now to be able to judge that. But without question, this was a significant failure there in the sense that they were able to take four aircraft. But again, they didn't do it with guns or explosives; they did it with knives.

MR. RUSSERT: The airline industry is losing $300 million a day, several teetering on bankruptcy or at least Chapter 11. Would you support a federal bailout of both loans and grants and assistance to the airline industry?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: The president hasn't really taken a position on any particular piece of legislation. And I think we're very interested in finding ways to make certain that in this particular instance, there is no sort of permanent damage, if you will, to our civil aviation capacity. It's very important. We've got people - Norm Mineta's working on it. Larry Lindsey, who heads the economic council, is heavily engaged in it. We're working with the airlines, and I'm sure we'll come up with some...

MR. RUSSERT: So you're open to the concept?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Absolutely.

MR. RUSSERT: About a week ago, we were all discussing the so-called Social Security trust fund and who...

VICE PRES. CHENEY: And the lockbox.

MR. RUSSERT: ...and the lockbox...

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Right.

MR. RUSSERT: ...and who spent the surplus. Is that debate now moot?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I think so. I certainly hope so. I think, you know, we've all been concerned to make certain we protect Social Security. But we clearly have a situation here - and that debate was a little bit fallacious anyway, because, in fact, there was never any question but what the United States government was going to pay its obligations to our seniors. We've never defaulted on a debt since Alexander Hamilton was Treasury secretary, so that's never really been an issue. But clearly, at this stage, we do have a surplus that's generated primarily by the payroll tax, and as has been true oftentimes in the past, that comes in, we were using it to retire debt. Clearly, some of it now is going to be used to meet this emergency, the urgent supplemental that the Congress passed this weekend of some $40 billion; take those steps we need to take, both to recover from this attack, as well as to do everything we can to prevent future ones.

MR. RUSSERT: The president said he would use the Social Security surplus in case of war and/or recession.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Right.

MR. RUSSERT: Do we now have both war and recession?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Quite possibly. We clearly have a war against terrorism and we don't know yet what the third quarter is going to be like. But if the economists come in and revise the second quarter down into negative territory in terms of Gross Domestic Product growth and the third quarter, fourth quarter-third quarter of the calendar year, fourth quarter of the fiscal year...

MR. RUSSERT: And the economic shock from this.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Yeah. If that comes in negative, then we'll have the definition of two negative quarters. That would qualify as a recession.

MR. RUSSERT: What about the debate over missile defense? Many Democrats are saying this now proves that our focus should be on terrorism and counterterrorism and preparedness, and that the primary threat is not something the missile defense could take care of.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, I just fundamentally disagree. I mean, there's no question but what there's a threat on the terrorist front, and we've got to deal with that. We've been work it. We'll continue to work it. But there are also-this does not, in any way, diminish the threat with respect to ballistic missiles down the road. A ballistic missile equipped with a weapon of mass destruction, a nuke, for example, a nuclear weapon would be far more devastating than what we just went through. If one of those was to hit one of our cities or to hit a major base overseas where US forces are deployed, the casualty list would be higher. The consequences would be even greater than the terrible tragedy we've just been through.

MR. RUSSERT: So we can afford this war on terrorism and a missile defense system?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I don't see, Tim, how anybody can argue that we cannot afford to defend America, and we're going to have to defend it against conventional threats. We're going to have to defend it against ballistic missile threats. We're going to have to defend it against the threat of terrorism. And I think for public officials to argue because we got hit with a terrorist assault, we should ignore the ballistic missile threat out there strikes me as irresponsible.

MR. RUSSERT: The stock market has been closed since Tuesday. It reopens tomorrow. Are you concerned?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I think that our economy is strong. I do believe the market's going to open tomorrow. That's clearly the current plan and expectation. I would hope - I'm not an investor anymore, because I had to get out of the market since I'm now a public official. But I would hope the American people would, in effect, stick their thumb in the eye of the terrorists and say that they've got great confidence in the country, great confidence in our economy, and not let what's happened here in any way throw off their normal level of economic activity. We look forward to recovery later this year from the slowdown period that we've been through, and I have every confidence that that will, in fact, happen.

MR. RUSSERT: Would you ever consider undoing or holding off or triggering part of the tax cut in the future if the resources were necessary?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: No, I think the tax cut's crucial. And that's exactly what we needed in terms of the slowdown. Having the tax cut out there now means we're going to have a more robust year than would have been the case without the tax cut. It's a key piece of stimulus. And I think the president did exactly the right thing.

MR. RUSSERT: There is such fervor, such emotion, such anger in the country right now. And as we conduct this war against terrorism, as you said, it's going to take, days, months, years. What do we ask of the American people? Will they have to sacrifice in order to help win this war?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I guess I would ask vigilance. Be aware of what's going on around you. Don't operate on the assumption that somehow because we live behind two oceans we're immune to attack. We now know we're not. I would ask, obviously, that they be understanding, if you will, of the importance of the effort that we're going to have to undertake here. We may end up, you know, with more stringent security measures at airports and things like that. But I think there's a unity and a spirit out there that I've not seen for a long time in this country. And I see it on Capitol Hill between Republicans and Democrats. I see it - the workers who were cleaning up the mess in New York where the president visited yesterday. I see it in the people I've talked with. And I think we have to recognize we are the strongest, most powerful nation on Earth. We've got a tremendous set of accomplishments and an enormously bright future ahead of us. There are those in the world who hate us and that will do everything they can to impose pain, and we can't let them win.

MR. RUSSERT: And we'll find them.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: We'll find them.

MR. RUSSERT: Mr. Vice President, we thank you for inviting us up to the mountains here with you, and we'll be watching you very carefully.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Thanks, Tim.

MR. RUSSERT: Like all of you, I have spent this week wiping my eyes and grinding my teeth and wondering why. I've drawn strength from a story about a man I knew, Father Michael Judge. The chaplain of the New York City Fire Department, a Franciscan, he raced to the World Trade Center after the explosion to comfort the injured. While administering the last rites to a dying rescue worker, he, himself, was killed by flying debris.

New York's bravest physically carried Father Mike away. They brought his body first to the altar of St. Peter's Church, where it would be safe, then to their firehouse on 31st Street, Hook and Ladder Company Number 24, directly across from the friary where he lived. They wrapped him in sheets and placed him in one of their own bunks. They asked his fellow Franciscans to cross the street and join them. Together -f iremen, priests, and brothers - wept and sang the prayer of St. Francis, "May the Lord bless and keep you and show his face to you and have mercy on you." That is the way of New York. That is the spirit of America. From February 1945 at Iwo Jima to September 2001 at the World Trade Center.

~~

NBC News -- http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/629714.asp

© Copyright 2001

Comments


No comments yet.

Please login to post your comment.













All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Stories, Arguments and Comments are owned by the Poster.
The Rest copyright © 2007 Argumentations.com. All rights reserved. Argumentations.com provides material for research or educational purposes only. We do not warrant the correctness of its contents. The risk from using it lies entirely with the user. While using this site, you agree to have read and accepted our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Argumentations.com is far from perfect so if you have any critiques, questions, comments or problems about this site please tell us. Click here to send your feedback. And if you like Argumentations.com please link to this site. It will really help a lot.
   

Tags

9/11,   Afghanistan,   Al-Qaeda,   Arab,   Bailout,   Bush,   Cheney,   CIA,   Counterterrorism,   Crime,   democracy,   Democrats,   Economy,   Egypt,   Europe,   FBI,   Hosni Mubarak,   Internet,   Islam,   Israel,   Jihad,   Jordan,   Kenya,   military,   NATO,   Osama bin Laden,   Pakistan,   religion,   Republicans,   Saudi Arabia,   Taliban,   Tanzania,   Terrorism,   USA,   Uzbekistan,   War Crimes,   War On Terror,   Yemen,  

Related statements

View other suggested stories

Date added 
2007-05-02Country Reports on Terrorism -- Chapter 5 -- Terrorist Safe Havens (7120 Report)
2007-05-02Country Reports on Terrorism -- Chapter 6 -- Terrorist Organizations
2007-08-16Text: President Bush Addresses the Nation
2007-11-11In the Wake of War: Geo-strategy, Terrorism, Oil Markets, and Domestic Politics
2008-01-29THE WAR ON TERROR: FOUR YEARS ON; Taking Stock Of the Forever War
2008-11-07Country Reports on Terrorism -- Chapter 2 -- Country Reports: Europe and Eurasia Overview
2008-12-13Getting Away with Torture?
2007-06-22Al Qaeda Strikes Back
2008-10-24The World Around Russia: 2017 -- An Outlook for the Midterm Future
2007-06-28Outsourcing Torture -- The secret history of America’s “extraordinary rendition” program
2007-05-02Country Reports on Terrorism -- Chapter 2 -- Country Reports: Europe and Eurasia Overview
2007-08-06The Global Drug Meta-Group: Drugs, Managed Violence, and the Russian 9/11
2009-05-10Country Reports on Terrorism 2008 -- Chapter 2. Country Reports: Middle East and North Africa Overview
2007-05-30The great escape
2007-09-08Knowing the Enemy
2008-09-02Can The War On Terror Be Won? -- How To Fight The Right War
2009-05-10Country Reports on Terrorism 2008 --
2008-09-13TERRORISM, HUMAN RIGHTS, SOCIAL JUSTICE, FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY: SOME CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE LEGAL AND JUSTICE PROFESSIONALS OF THE ‘COALITION OF THE WILLING’
2008-11-11The Case for Restraint -- Foreign policy after George W. Bush
2007-08-08The Global War on Terrorism -- The First 100 Days
2006-04-20The Next Iraqi War? Sectarianism and Civil Conflict
2006-10-09The Anglo-American War of Terror: An Overview
2008-08-25The Worldwide Threat 2004: Challenges in a Changing Global Context
2008-04-24Revamping American Grand Strategy
2008-07-05Symposium: Israel's Test
2008-09-26Copenhagen Consensus 2008 Challenge Paper Terrorism
2009-05-10Country Reports on Terrorism 2008 -- Chapter 2. Country Reports: Europe and Eurasia Overview
2007-01-25Make War Your Friend, Part I
2007-03-05Timeline: al-Qaida
2007-04-02From the Wonderful Folks Who Brought You Iraq
2007-06-22Symposium: Strategies of Death
2008-05-27Laptop Jihadi
2008-02-26Fitzgerald: Islam for Infidels, Part Two
2008-04-04Interview: Lee Kuan Yew -- Part 1
2008-04-18Choosing War: The Decision to Invade Iraq and Its Aftermath
2007-10-22The Secret History of the Impending War with Iran That the White House Doesn't Want You to Know
2008-01-11After Iraq
2007-12-10Timeline: the al-Qaida tapes
2007-05-11Waning Chances for Stability -- Least Bad Options in a Failed, War-Torn State
2007-04-04The Next World Order
2006-11-26Islam, Terror and the Second Nuclear Age
2007-11-22The United States’ new backyard
2007-12-29His Toughness Problem — and Ours
2007-10-23Torture in the Name of Freedom
2007-08-29President Bush Addresses the 89th Annual National Convention of the American Legion
2007-09-17Why We're Losing the War on Terror
2008-02-29Islamist Bubbles -- Beware the light at the end of the Islamist tunnel
2008-03-03President Addresses Joint Armed Forces Officers' Wives' Luncheon
2008-03-05The radical dawa in transition -- The rise of Islamic neoradicalism in the Netherlands
2008-02-23The Two Faces of Saudi Arabia
2008-06-03Some European Perspectives on Terrorism
2008-06-10Impeach George W. Bush Resolution
2008-08-09Chasing a Mirage
2008-08-01The Democrats & National Security
2008-10-11America and Political Islam: Clash of Cultures or Clash of Interests?
2008-11-07Country Reports on Terrorism -- Chapter 2 -- Country Reports: Middle East and North Africa Overview
2008-11-10The US's geopolitical nightmare
2008-11-09Blueprint for Change -- Obama and Biden’s Plan for America
2008-11-14Towards a Grand Strategy for an Uncertain World -- Renewing Transatlantic Partnership
2006-09-12The Nation That Fell to Earth
2006-12-06Transcript - The Nomination Hearing for Robert M. Gates
2007-05-03Timeline: Al-Qaeda
2008-07-20The Green Light
2008-07-07Bush and bin Laden
2008-08-11Rethinking the National Interest -- American Realism for a New World
2008-08-28Vice President's Remarks on the 90th National Convention of the American Legion
2007-09-09It's the Demography, Stupid
2008-01-07Azzam the American -- The making of an Al Qaeda homegrown
2007-11-16The Crisis Of Pakistan: A Dangerously Weak State
2007-12-12Al Qaeda's Best Publicist
2008-12-03Right at the Edge
2008-12-06Obama's War Cabinet
2009-01-16The Joint Operating Environment (JOE)
2008-09-18US Genocide in Iraq
2008-09-20How We Misunderstand Terrorism
2009-06-01Obama's Cairo Speech
2007-05-02Country Reports on Terrorism -- Chapter 2 -- Country Reports: Africa Overview
2007-05-10A Reporter At Large: In The Party Of God (Part II)
2007-05-10Hezbollah, Illegal Immigration, and the Next 9/11
2007-06-16The Osama Files
2007-06-17General Tommy Franks -- An exclusive interview with America's top general in the war on terrorism
2007-07-08Bin Laden's Fatwa
2007-07-12House Armed Services Committee Global Security Assessment Statement For The Record
2007-07-29Al-Qaida: the unwanted guests
2007-07-31CNN Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer
2007-01-23Crusading in the Arc of Instability - George Bush's Crusading Scorecard (2001-2007)
2007-03-24Is the American Empire on the Brink of Collapse?
2006-09-089/11 in a Movie-Made World
2006-10-25US: world empire of chaos
2008-01-19A Political-Risk Outlook for 2008
2007-09-07Understanding the U.S.-Israel Alliance: An Israeli Response to the Walt-Mearsheimer Claim
2007-11-13The Deadly Embrace
2008-05-26The Failed States Index 2007
2008-05-04Rush Interviews Andrew McCarthy
2008-05-17Planned US Israeli Attack on Iran: Will there be a War against Iran?
2009-05-22The Revenge of Geography
2009-07-20Transcript of President Barack Obama's speech at the National Archives
2007-03-03Scapegoating Pakistan
2007-04-10Six Crises in Search of an Author
2007-02-19Hating America
2007-07-13The New York Times Surrenders -- A monument to defeatism on the editorial page
2007-07-04Rising to a New Generation of Global Challenges
2007-06-17More Smoke on the Horizon in the Middle East War Theater
2007-06-07The Global Weapons of Mass Destruction Threat: A Counter- Argument to the Western Interdisciplinary Viewpoint
2007-06-08Political Islam
2007-05-02Country Reports on Terrorism -- Chapter 2 -- Country Reports: Middle East and North Africa Overview
2007-05-30Lost in transition
2008-03-14Aims and Methods of Europe's Muslim Brotherhood
2008-03-16Bush is an idiot, but he was right about Saddam
2008-03-24Chalmers Johnson: “Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic”
2008-08-25Securitarism, reproduction of disorder and erosion of democratic rule of law
2007-11-04While Pakistan Burns
2007-08-29Making America Safer by Defeating Extremists in the Middle East
2007-09-28The Mega-Lie Called the "War on Terror": A Masterpiece of Propaganda
2007-12-18Turkey's EU Membership's Possible Impacts on the Middle East
2007-12-27A Conversation With Benazir Bhutto
2007-11-16The Threat of Maritime Terrorism to Israel
2007-11-20The Neoconservative Moment
2007-11-20Whose War?
2009-06-13Remarks By The President On A New Beginning
2009-02-11Renewing American Leadership
2008-11-23The American Mission?
2007-06-01The Importance of Being Lucid
2007-05-22Statements made by Democratic leaders about Saddam Hussein's acquisition or possession of WMD
2007-06-12Singing CAIR’s Tune, On Your Dime
2007-07-04Renewing American Leadership
2007-07-01Why the Future May Not Belong to Islam
2007-07-07Bin Laden tape: Text
2007-08-05The End of Cowboy Diplomacy
2007-08-10Who Is Osama Bin Laden?
2007-08-15President Delivers State of the Union Address
2007-08-20A False Choice in Pakistan
2007-01-24President Bush’s State of the Union Address
2006-05-01‘The Enemy at Home’ - First Chapter
2006-12-03Baghdad Year Zero - Pillaging Iraq in pursuit of a neocon utopia
2007-04-069-11 AND THE SMOKING GUN -- Part 1: 'Independent' commission
2007-04-04Breaking Ranks -- What turned Brent Scowcroft against the Bush Administration?
2007-03-01ARAB COUNTRIES - GENERAL ANALYSIS
2007-03-09Assembly, Opening Debate On Question Of Palestine, Hears Call For Enhanced UN Involvement In Current Middle East Situation
2006-10-13Regional Implications of Shi‘a
2006-09-25Richard Clarke 9/11 prepared testimony
2006-05-01Political Islam -- Forty shades of green
2007-12-08September 11, 2001: The French Knew Much About It
2008-01-09Will Justice Go After Cheney?
2007-10-02A Tale of Extraordinary Renditions and Double-Standards -- THE FORGOTTEN PRISONER
2007-08-24The Challenge of Islam
2007-10-03Why the United States Invaded Iraq and is Now Thinking About Invading Iran
2008-08-25The changes in the fight against illegal immigration in the Euro-Mediterranean area and in Euro-Mediterranean relations
2008-04-05The Coming of Eurabia
2008-04-10Eretz Israel HaShlema / Greater Israel
2008-02-22Conversations in International Relations: Interview with John J. Mearsheimer (Part II)
2008-06-11The History of the House of Rothschild
2008-06-25Samson's Fate
2008-12-03Symposium: Iran: The Countdown
2008-11-06Country Reports on Terrorism -- Chapter 2 -- Country Reports: Africa Overview
2008-11-06Country Reports on Terrorism -- Chapter 2 -- Country Reports: East Asia and Pacific Overview
2008-11-05Post cold war Indian foreign policy
2008-10-11Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam
2009-05-10Country Reports on Terrorism 2008 -- Chapter 1. Strategic Assessment
2006-05-01Voices Baffled, Brash and Irate in Guantánamo
2006-09-09President Bush Delivers Remarks on Terrorism
2006-09-03Transcript - President Bush's Speech
2006-10-13Interview Vali Nasr
2007-03-18Between Europe And The Middle East: The Transformation Of Turkish Policy
2007-04-12The Eurabia Code
2006-12-18“Osama’s Dream”
2007-01-27My Worst Moment As a Lawyer
2007-03-01The “White” al-Qaeda and the Future of Europe
2007-08-12How the ‘Good War’ in Afghanistan Went Bad
2007-07-26President Bush Discusses War on Terror in South Carolina
2007-07-17A world wide web of terror
2007-06-06Nato’s Islamists
2007-06-17Gen. Wesley Clark Weighs Presidential Bid: "I Think About It Everyday
2007-06-18A PACKAGE DEAL FOR THE MIDDLE EAST
2007-06-05President Bush Visits Prague, Czech Republic, Discusses Freedom
2007-05-30Meet the Press [NBC] Interview With Prince Bandar
2007-05-30The Arabian candidate
2007-05-31The Case for Bombing Iran
2007-05-02Country Reports on Terrorism -- Chapter 2 -- Country Reports: South and Central Asia Overview
2008-06-27President Delivers "State of the Union"
2008-06-30Preparing the Battlefield
2008-06-16Not an island -- Europe and the Middle East
2008-05-19Walker's World: Bush with the pharaohs
2008-04-29The Pentagon's New Map
2008-02-22Three blind men confront the elephant that is this globalization era’s radical extremist reaction--and surprise! They all see a different beast!
2008-03-23Dissecting the Danish Cartoon Controversy
2008-08-21The Breaking Point -- A New Age of Torture
2008-08-12The Myth of Grass-Roots Terrorism -- Why Osama bin Laden Still Matters
2008-07-07Wrestling for influence
2007-10-16The global Oil grab of 2007
2007-11-11The Next Act -- Is a damaged Administration less likely to attack Iran, or more?
2007-11-01Noam Chomsky - Controlled Asset Of The New World Order
2007-09-16How Al-Qa'idah 'martyrs' enter Iraq
2007-09-17Commentary: Is 'terrorist threat' to America another Bush-Cheney fabrication?
2008-01-24A Moral Core for U.S. Foreign Policy
2008-02-04Arming the Middle East
2008-02-08The Fallacy of Grievance-based Terrorism
2007-12-12Jihad reconsidered
2007-12-13Bilderberg 2007 - Towards a One World Empire?
2007-11-26Norwegian Jihad -- Transcript
2007-12-03Sudan: Humanitarian Crisis, Peace Talks, Terrorism, and U.S. Policy
2009-05-10Country Reports on Terrorism 2008 -- Chapter 2. Country Reports: East Asia and Pacific Overview
2009-05-10Country Reports on Terrorism 2008 -- Chapter 4: The Global Challenge of WMD Terrorism
2009-02-08One on One: 'With no likelihood of US use of force, that leaves Israel'
2009-01-19This war on terrorism is bogus
2009-01-21Iran: Breaking the Nuclear Deadlock -- A Chatham House Report
2008-09-12A Grim Anniversary
2008-11-30EU2020 essay Willing and able? -- EU defence in 2020
2008-11-11The Case for Restraint -- Niall Ferguson responds
2007-05-02Country Reports on Terrorism -- Chapter 1 -- Strategic Assessment
2007-05-02Country Reports on Terrorism -- Chapter 2 -- Country Reports: East Asia and Pacific Overview
2007-05-05WHY IRAN WILL HAVE THE BOMB
2007-06-13Resource Wars - Can We Survive Them?
2007-06-16African Gothic
2007-07-01Democratic Realism -- An American Foreign Policy for a Unipolar World
2007-07-02Zionist Plan for the Middle East
2007-07-17Al-Qaida may use Iraqi network to attack U.S.
2007-07-27To Check Syria, U.S. Explores Bond With Muslim Brothers
2007-08-10The Role of Pakistan's Military Intelligence (ISI) in the September 11 Attacks
2007-03-01President Bush Discusses Progress in Afghanistan, Global War on Terror
2007-01-27Interview with Stephen Grey
2007-01-24The price of hypocrisy
2007-01-23Al Jazeera's Global Gamble- A PEJ Interview - Al Jazeera Timeline
2007-01-09Despite their shoddy track record on Iraq analysis, O'Reilly trusts only "my military analysts
2007-01-14Natural Resources are Fuelling a New Cold War
2006-12-04Afghanistan: No blood for oil - this time
2006-12-15The Israel Lobby
2007-03-31The Second Lebanon War -- It probably won't be the last
2007-03-19Made in USA
2007-03-21Chris Hedges: The Christian Right’s War on America
2007-03-03The Iraq insurgency for beginners
2007-03-05HOW BRITAIN'S ARMAMENTS FUEL WAR AND POVERTY
2007-03-05PILGER: THIS WAR IS A FRAUD
2006-08-27Bush Lets U.S. Spy on Callers Without Courts
2006-09-09How Common Ground of 9/11 Gave Way to Partisan Split
2006-09-08Laying Blame and Passing the Buck, Dramatized
2006-09-17Triple-pronged Jihad -- Military, Economic and Cultural
2007-12-09The History and Unwritten Future of Salafism
2007-12-15Why We Should Oppose an Independent Kosovo
2007-12-20Press Conference by the President
2008-02-06The Rage, the Pride and the Doubt -- Thoughts on the eve of battle in Iraq
2008-01-29Yemen’s Deals With Jihadists Unsettle the U.S.
2008-02-02Escaping “Submission"
2008-01-24The Three Rs: Rivalry, Russia, ’Ran
2008-01-11The General in his Labyrinth
2008-01-04Why Iraq? Oil and U.S. Foreign Policy
2008-01-02How to Defuse Iran
2007-09-13National Commission On Terrorist Attacks Upon The United States
2007-09-14How the CIA Helped Germany Foil Terror Plot
2007-09-08Bin Laden Expert: He's Winning
2007-11-02Vice President's Remarks to the Heritage Foundation
2007-11-09HOW STUPID DO THEY THINK WE ARE?
2007-11-12NATO Expands into Arab South
2007-11-06President Bush Discusses Global War on Terror
2007-10-04Open Fire
2008-07-25Crimes and Misdemeanors -- Complete List
2008-08-04Intensify the witch-hunt -- Making us safer is not the aim
2008-08-06Extradition Delayed Is Justice Denied
2008-08-06Douglas Feith's War and Decision: Life in a Neocon's Parallel Universe
2008-08-19Double Standards in the Global War on Terror
2008-03-31BLOOD BROTHERS
2008-04-05Is Iran Next? The Importance of Geopolitics
2008-04-13Holistic Integrative Analysis of International Change: A Commentary on Teaching Emergent Futures
2008-03-06"Victory Would be a Fata Morgana"
2008-03-04The Last Days of Europe
2008-04-29The Man Between War and Peace
2008-04-24A Dissenter’s Guide to Foreign Policy
2008-05-19Bush’s Speech Prods Middle East Leaders
2008-05-14Resisting the Empire
2008-05-27Was it like this for the Irish? -- Gareth Peirce on the position of Muslims in Britain
2008-06-01German Spy Chief Warns of Al-Qaida's Growing Strength in North Africa -- 'JIHAD ON OUR DOORSTEP'
2008-06-18The Age of Nonpolarity -- What Will Follow U.S. Dominance
2008-07-02The Story Behind George Bush's Lies -- What Scott McClellan (and Jay Rockefeller) Didn't Tell Us
2008-07-02The Impeachment of George W. Bush
2008-06-27Daughter of the Enlightenment
2008-06-25HOW HEZBOLLAH DEFEATED ISRAEL -- PART 3: The political
2008-11-10Fighting the real fight
2008-12-18Transcript: Cheney Defends Hard Line Tactics
2008-12-22Manama Dialogue (Bahrain) As Delivered by Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates
2008-09-16Official American Sadism
2008-10-12Operation Sarkozy : how the CIA placed one of its agents at the presidency of the French Republic
2008-11-06Country Reports on Terrorism -- Chapter 1 -- Strategic Assessment
2009-02-02Freedom Beats A Global Retreat
2009-07-16Why we must win in Afghanistan
2009-08-10Crisis As A Way To A Global Totalitarian State
2009-09-12No Escape From Guantánamo -- The Latest Habeas Corpus Rulings
2006-09-05Afghan Symbol for Change Becomes a Symbol of Failure
2006-08-21Ask the expert: Bush’s foreign policy
2006-05-01Tyranny and Terror
2006-10-26President Bush on Iraq
2006-10-27What Went Wrong in Iraq
2007-03-05JOHN PILGER: THIS WAR OF LIES GOES ON
2007-03-04The Leadership of George W. Bush: Con & Pro
2007-03-18Terrorists Proving Harder to Profile -- European Officials Say Traits of Suspected Islamic Extremists Are Constantly Shifting
2007-04-02Reaction From Around the World
2007-03-27Our World: Condi's embrace of jihadist 'peace'
2007-04-09Where Plan A left Ahmad Chalabi
2006-12-03The Way Out of War - A blueprint for leaving Iraq now
2006-12-03The Next War
2006-12-18“Bush’s Dream”
2007-01-11Transcript of President Bush’s Address to Nation on U.S. Policy in Iraq
2007-01-25MIDDLE EAST - Timeline of recent developments
2007-01-18Annotate This: Escalation in Iraq
2007-02-26Legal Issues in the War on Terrorism
2007-02-20Transformational Diplomacy
2007-08-13The Limits of Multiculturalism - The Dutch Labor Party and Islam
2007-08-08Obama right on target in war on “errorism”
2007-08-17Weapons of Mass Preservation -- Op-Ed Contributor
2007-07-24Highlights in the History of U.S. Relations With Russia, 1780-June 2006
2007-07-08U.S. Aborted Raid on Qaeda Chiefs in Pakistan in ’05
2007-07-13Press Conference by the President
2007-06-12Globalizing Weakness: Is Global Poverty a Threat to the Interests of States?
2007-06-11Sudan is secret partner of U.S
2007-06-19Comparing US & Palestine homicide rates
2007-05-01Attack on Iran is the next step in divide and conquer of Middle East
2007-04-25Gravy Train: Feeding The Pentagon By Feeding Somalia
2007-06-01Islam in the West
2007-06-01A Life in Violent Motion
2007-05-17Rehabilitating US Imperialism
2008-06-26Jerusalem: The Final Frontier
2008-06-24Chomsky Speaks -- On Iraq, Iran and Norman Finkelstein
2008-07-03'Countdown with Keith Olbermann' for Thursday, May 29
2008-06-08Treacherous Alliance
2008-03-02The world as Shakespearean tragedy
2008-04-23Religious Extremism: Muslim Challenge And Islamic Response
2008-04-05Brothers in Arms?
2008-03-29PAKISTAN & AL QAEDA: US REVIEWS OPTIONS
2008-03-22Muslims, Democracy, and the American Experience
2008-03-22"Allah Will Not Change the Condition of a People"
2008-08-07Brzezinski’s bunker
2008-09-02Torture and liberty
2008-07-28Rome Diary: Italy's Leap Into The Dark
2008-07-31Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre delivers speech at Harvard University
2008-07-09Shackled Warrior
2008-09-07Terrorized by 'War on Terror'
2007-10-04Iran Is Found To Be a Lair of Al Qaeda - Intelligence Estimate Cites Two Councils
2007-10-15The new Taliban
2007-10-15An Internet Jihad Sells Extremism to Viewers in the U.S.
2007-10-21In Pakistan Quandary, U.S. Reviews Stance
2007-11-07Blood borders -- How a better Middle East would look
2007-10-30Michael Ledeen discusses the Iranian Time Bomb
2007-09-08Mugged by reality -- How it all went wrong in Iraq
2007-09-15An Interview With Robert Spencer
2007-09-25Distorting Desire
2007-12-31Bhutto Killing Caps West's Year of Failure
2008-01-07U.S. Considers New Covert Push Within Pakistan
2008-01-09Bush's Messiah Complex
2008-01-24Root Causes and Rotten Ideas: On Dinesh D'Souza's The Enemy At Home
2008-01-21Papers Paint New Portrait of Iraq's Foreign Insurgents
2008-01-15Militants Escape Control of Pakistan, Officials Say
2008-01-31Israeli-Turkish military cooperation: Iranian perceptions and responses
2008-01-30Jew-Hatred and Jihad -- The Nazi roots of the 9/11 attack
2008-02-06The 2007 Irving Kristol Lecture by Bernard Lewis
2008-02-04Chomsky on World Ownership
2007-12-22Bush/Gore Second Presidential Debate October 11
2007-12-13Crisis of Faith in the Muslim World
2007-12-02The Smart Way to Beat Tyrants Like Chavez
2009-07-07President Barack Obama???s Moscow speech
2009-06-22The panopticon economy
2009-05-10Country Reports on Terrorism 2008 -- Chapter 2. Country Reports: Africa Overview
2009-05-10Country Reports on Terrorism 2008 -- Chapter 3: State Sponsors of Terrorism
2009-05-10Country Reports on Terrorism 2008 -- Chapter 2. Country Reports: South and Central Asia Overview
2009-05-08The Trilateral Commission -- Membership 2008
2009-06-12Obama calls for new beginning between US, Muslims
2009-06-07The Wages of Hubris and Vengeance -- The Future of Israel and the Decline of the American Empire
2009-02-12Obama’s Prime-Time Press Briefing -- Transcript
2008-10-30Pakistan: Waiting with bated breath
2008-11-01The End Of Arrogance -- America Loses Its Dominant Economic Role
2008-10-13Letter to Chairman Rockefeller and Vice Chairman Bond
2008-10-09U.S. Study Is Said to Warn of Crisis in Afghanistan
2008-10-15A mad scramble over Afghanistan
2008-10-18Enoch Powell and the Rise of Political Correctness in Britain
2008-10-26Afghanistan: the neo-Taliban campaign -- What Nato failed to understand
2008-09-12"End States Who Sponsor Terrorism"
2008-09-25Power, Politics & Scholarship
2008-10-02U.S. Not Winning War on Terror -- Special Report
2008-10-08Iran’s Secret Bargain With Bush?
2008-12-18Senate Armed Services Committee Inquiry Into The Treatment Of Detainees In U.S. Custody
2008-12-06Muslim Revolution -- How Washington Arrogance Helped Drive the Mumbai Attacks
2008-12-25India's Reckless Road to Washington -- Through Tel Aviv
2008-11-10Syrians stare terror in the face
2008-11-10The Eurabian Revolution
2008-11-08For Eyes of President-Elect Obama Only
2008-11-10Secret Order Lets U.S. Raid Al Qaeda in Many Countries
2008-11-25Lawsuit's claim: CAIR no longer even exists
2008-11-19Afghanistan – Worth the Sacrifice -- John Hutton Address
2007-05-15The New Demographic Balance in Europe and its Consequences
2007-04-24Bush Moves Toward Martial Law
2007-04-24Fascist America, in 10 easy steps
2007-04-15Eye on Iran, Rivals Pursuing Nuclear Power
2007-05-01Iran’s Nuclear Calculations
2007-05-02Country Reports on Terrorism -- Briefing on Release of 2006
2007-05-02Country Reports on Terrorism -- Chapter 2 -- Country Reports: Western Hemisphere Overview
2007-05-05Don't Be Fooled by Propaganda
2007-05-03Sharia Crisis in Nigeria
2007-06-22Lessons from Madrid bombing
2007-06-12A Review of “The Assault on Reason”
2007-06-07How Permanent Are Those Bases?
2007-06-08Remarks at the Centennial Dinner for the Economic Club of New York
2007-06-08Islam and Liberal Democracy: A Historical Overview
2007-06-13The Muslim Marshall Plan
2007-07-08Martyrdom? What a bargain!
2007-06-28TALIBAN WON'T HAND OVER OSAMA BIN LADEN
2007-07-22Fisk Interview with President Khatami
2007-07-15“Two States Or One State” -- Debate by Uri Avnery & Ilan Pappe
2007-07-31Franco – Arab Ties Could Yet Survive Sarkozy’s U-Turn
2007-08-08Rorschach and Awe -- The War on Terror
2007-08-08Red Mosque: Endgame for Musharraf?
2007-08-08Monsieur Lévy’s Working Holiday
2007-02-18After Neoconservatism
2007-02-10Q&A: Neocon power examined
2007-02-28RUSSIA AND THE NEW COLD WAR -- When cowboys don't shoot straight
2007-02-26Which Will It Be America, Empire or Democracy?
2007-01-10Airstrike Rekindles Somalis’ Anger at the U.S.
2006-12-16Revamping Us Foreign Policy, Part 1 - Full speed ahead, with menace
2006-12-31"They Take The Mind, and What Emerges is Just Tapioca Pudding"
2007-01-03Tomgram: On the Imperial Path in 2007
2007-04-06It Doesn't Stay in Vegas
2007-04-05"Promoting Democracy: A Progressive Foreign Policy Agenda".
2007-04-15Race in Scandinavia
2007-03-19Bush's Shadow Army
2007-03-04Enlightenment fundamentalism or racism of the anti-racists?
2007-03-09Gitmo's Guerrilla Lawyers
2007-03-14Timeline of events in the Cold War
2006-10-25The new Great Game
2006-11-21"War of the Worlds" or "Clash of Civilisations"?